This article isn't really about Peterson, it's about Price's Law. There's certainly some discussion to be had about how that law is conceived/applicable, but yo

This article isn't really about Peterson, it's about Price's Law. There's certainly some discussion to be had about how that law is conceived/applicable, but you seem to be taking the tack that Price's law is a suspect concept because Jordan Peterson is introducing people to it. If we're talking intellectual models, I doubt people are going to be impressed by that approach. Since we're here, though, I'm interested in evidence that Peterson is on the fringes of Psychology (the WaPo link does not make that case; it's not even clear it's a criticism of Peterson, though it arguably damns with faint praise). I think he and his audiences could use more good critics.