4 ms·
Not trying to be snarky but... how is it cheaper to hire a freelance IT person to set up something for you, and help you when it breaks/changes, than $7/mo for
by jpochtar 8y ago
Not trying to be snarky but... how is it cheaper to hire a freelance IT person to set up something for you, and help you when it breaks/changes, than $7/mo for Heroku?
- ceejayoz 8y agoThe issue with Heroku is it rapidly gets more than $7/month if you hit any sort of scale.
- always_good 8y agoIn my experience this is vastly overstated. Also, just because you use Heroku for your app servers (dynos) doesn't mean you have to use it for everything.
- hellofunk 8y agoAbsolutely. We went from free tier to about 100/month in nearly no time with Heroku. It’s worth it though. Heroku takes care of all sorts of stuff, and that fee is still cheaper than hiring a sys admin for a small business.
- jdietrich 8y agoThat is quite literally the price you pay for convenience. In many cases, that's a very rational tradeoff - your time is better spent on developing and marketing your app than dealing with devops. If your Heroku bill is a relevant business problem, then you're probably grossly under-charging for your app. I think the main competition for Heroku these days is AWS and GCP. The workflow for deploying directly to managed cloud services has improved drastically over the last few years, so you might not need the niceties that Heroku offer.