> If you made that bet you would have absolutely no evidence for making it. I don't have evidence in terms of AGI, but there is evidence that ants have survive

> If you made that bet you would have absolutely no evidence for making it. I don't have evidence in terms of AGI, but there is evidence that ants have survived a myriad of changes and disasters in the past (Goggle tells me they evolved 92 mya). So AGI and/or humans would have to do something radically different to the biome for organisms like ants to go extinct. Something not seen since the rise of multi-cellular life. Seems much more likely human civilization bites the dust first. > Where would we be if the cyanobacteria could decide not to start producing oxygen? But they didn't have a choice. We do. Why would I care about the possibility for some more sophisticated life form in the far future if it means my species goes extinct?