3 ms·
I think the post I answered was referring to PGE's Solar Choice program, which I agree is not a good deal for a consumer. But it's marketed specifically as a
by danans 8y ago
I think the post I answered was referring to PGE's Solar Choice program, which I agree is not a good deal for a consumer.
But it's marketed specifically as a program where you pay a premium to fund the greening of the grid [1][2]. It actually states that you will pay a premium for this plan.
1. https://www.pge.com/en_US/residential/solar-and-vehicles/options/solar/solar-choice/solar-choice.page?WT.mc_id=Vanity_solarchoice https://www.pge.com/en_US/residential/solar-and-vehicles/opt...
2. https://www.sfgate.com/business/article/PG-E-s-eco-friendly-offer-Pay-more-and-6805020.php https://www.sfgate.com/business/article/PG-E-s-eco-friendly-...
- tathougies 8y agoI am not referring to PGE's solar choice program. Marin county runs its own green energy, independent of PG&E. PG&E owns the wires. I get it costs money to run the wires. However, it is wrong to waive the fee for those using PG&E services. It's anti-competitive and bad for the state.