According to http://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/san-francisco-population/ http://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/san-francisco-pop... SF pop is 87

According to http://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/san-francisco-population/ http://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/san-francisco-pop... SF pop is 870,887. Budget for 17/18 is 10,106 millions, which make it $11,604 per capita: that means more budget per capita than most states, except Minnesota, Washington, Kentucky, Wyoming, Oregon, and North Dakota. Your first point was City budgets are tiny compared to state budgets which are tiny compared to the federal budgets. which is simply not true when speaking of SF. You shouldn't compare it to some of the smallest and most conservative states with the smallest state budgets. You're saying I should cherry pick the data so SF doesn't look that bad in comparison?