4 ms·
You seem to ignore my point about multiple stakeholders. I believe that the happiness measure is not a measure of outcomes but happiness with getting a represen
by SubiculumCode 8y ago
You seem to ignore my point about multiple stakeholders.
I believe that the happiness measure is not a measure of outcomes but happiness with getting a representative closer to his/her choice or preference...meaning one that may best represent their views, desires, and needs in government. Tha seems like good governance.
- bsdetector 8y agoYou seem to ignore my point about the collective good. By definition measuring happiness is measuring feelings. Rule by emotion. When has that ever worked out well? If closer to personal preference is better, shouldn't direct democracy - absolute majority rule - be the ideal? But it's clearly not the case, at least not in any sizeable country.