Sorry, I was imprecise. I did not mean it would be better to use conventional aircraft. I meant to claim that it would be better to use a human with a gun to do

Sorry, I was imprecise. I did not mean it would be better to use conventional aircraft. I meant to claim that it would be better to use a human with a gun to do the assassination - at least when operating in an area with potential for civilian casualties. Use of heavy ordnance in an area with civilians should have no excuses if there is the alternative to use human operators. I don't care how far up the rank of Isis or Al Kaida the person targeted is. Risking civilian casualties should not be acceptable. A combat in a war and an assassination are two different things - I was condidering an assassination which by nature should be fine grained.