3 ms·
Yes it's quoted in the article too, however "necessary for the purposes" is subject to interpretation, and there is a huge leeway here. In practice it is alway
by zerostar07 8y ago
Yes it's quoted in the article too, however "necessary for the purposes" is subject to interpretation, and there is a huge leeway here. In practice it is always possible to claim that some procedure would require retention for longer, and it would be impossible to have them prosecuted for that.
- ocdtrekkie 8y agoIf they divvy up a monthly fee to the sites you visit, they're going to have a hard time explaining the need to keep your browsing data more than a single month: Enough time to pay out to the websites. Then you can maybe add a couple months to account for backups and the like. It sounds like trimming the data retention here was well-warranted, particularly given the high sensitivity of browsing data.