3 ms·
More transparent maybe. >use disorderly conduct The police would just automatically agree with the agent, if you're not in a filmed area then you could get to
by thatcat 8y ago
More transparent maybe.
>use disorderly conduct
The police would just automatically agree with the agent, if you're not in a filmed area then you could get to go to court, be essentially forced to plead guilty, pay fines, and write an apology letter to the person who may have groped you inappropriately. Then you're on a public list, where anyone can use this possibly incorrect information against you.
The secret list actually sounds more democratic than (ab)using the court system to me since it's basically just a private account of someones opinion and everyones entitled to free speech.
- greggarious 8y ago>The secret list actually sounds more democratic than (ab)using the court system to me since it's basically just a private account of someones opinion and everyones entitled to free speech. I probably should have made this assumption explicit, but I would assume that police summoned to a checkpoint and told things like "he rudely opted out" would be told that no crime has occurred. This is the case currently, and the whole reason they're creating a list: to punish legal behavior.