3 ms·
I would say that this is not a good article. It touches several topics and mixes them up without really being good or clear on any of them. You could write an a
by danbruc 8y ago
I would say that this is not a good article. It touches several topics and mixes them up without really being good or clear on any of them. You could write an article about the concept of identity as it applies to humans, you could write an article about this imposter case, you could write an article about identity as it applies to electrons or more generally fermions and bosons, which don't both behave the same under exchange of two particles, you could write yet another article trying to shed some light onto the wave and particle nature of fundamental particles. There would be enough things to discuss for any of these topics to get an long article out of it, heck, you could write entire books on them. But this article just grabs random pieces from all of the topics and leaves you not any wiser on any of them.
- nixpulvis 8y agoIt fits a trend in modern philosophical publishing. Part of the reason I'm so quick to stop (or not even start reading) articles like this.