4 ms·
by doing so the content is now blocked from eu-based users because some gdpr shittery at la times
by zsellera 8y ago
by doing so the content is now blocked from eu-based users because some gdpr shittery at la times
- bambataa 8y agoHow embarrassing for the LA Times that they couldn’t get basic compliance in place in time to even let unregistered users read an article.
- ams6110 8y agoLast time I checked, Los Angeles was in California, not the EU. Why should they have to care about EU regs?
- rtkwe 8y agoBecause the GDPR affects anyone serving and collecting data of EU citizens...
- bambataa 8y agoBecause people in the EU read their articles and view their adverts, which is presumably how they make a lot of their cash. What are they doing with the data of an unregistered visitor that means they aren't GDPR-compliant?
- rtkwe 8y agoThe link is pointing to NYTimes. OP was saying the original Boing Boing article pointed to both and the link was changed to the Times article, per the HN preference for linking to the original reporting (sometimes to the detriment when other articles provide commentary or additional insight).
- mfjordvald 8y agoI accessed it just fine from Portugal just now. Maybe it's something else wrong?
- Fnoord 8y agoThe Latimes article is blocked for EU; the NYT article works though without opt-out, and clicking "X" is same as "I Agree" (hello dark pattern).
- dredmorbius 8y agohttps://outline.com/http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-bovard-tsa-watchlist-20180528-story.html https://outline.com/http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-... Direct: https://outline.com/Uw75c8 https://outline.com/Uw75c8 https://duckduckgo.com?q=!wayback%20http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-bovard-tsa-watchlist-20180528-story.html https://duckduckgo.com?q=!wayback%20http://www.latimes.com/o... Direct: https://web.archive.org/web/20180530171449/http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-bovard-tsa-watchlist-20180528-story.html https://web.archive.org/web/20180530171449/http://www.latime...