Oh, I didn't know this about Firefox - thanks a lot, ldjb! My intention was to be a good HTTP citizen and return the correct status code with a decent represen

Oh, I didn't know this about Firefox - thanks a lot, ldjb! My intention was to be a good HTTP citizen and return the correct status code with a decent representation. Returning 200 for "not actually found what you wanted, but here's something else you can use" seems odd, but maybe I'm just being too pedantic here and the pragmatic way would be better. Thanks for pointing out the Firefox issue again, it would have probably never occured to me that FF behaves that way. That hint saved me a lot of time "fixing" the parser.