Software engineering is a whole discipline with several stages, it is mostly technology agnostic for most of the process. There are even people who say that all

Software engineering is a whole discipline with several stages, it is mostly technology agnostic for most of the process. There are even people who say that all technology choices are just implementation details, and I do believe the same if I need to think abstract and formulate/define the larger patterns in area domain to work at. That was quite empty article... what’s that? A sales pitch for the next article? The only comment related to design was an implementation detail: the Go modules are git urls. Even at speaking an implementation the article fails: the article does not comment the pros, cons, consequences, problems or typical pitfalls, and evolution in time of this decision; it even does not compare with any other existing choices out there. I believe these kind of articles should not be part of HN since it just aims to exploit the audience. Edit: format