3 ms·
Ubiquity is based on the Vyatta platform, which means it’s pretty decent as a network device. Unless you’ve got gigabit WAN speeds, it will probably be suffici
by bradknowles 8y ago
Ubiquity is based on the Vyatta platform, which means it’s pretty decent as a network device. Unless you’ve got gigabit WAN speeds, it will probably be sufficient for your SOHO needs. But I would split the wireless functions from the Routing/firewall functions. You might even do a three-way split with dedicated devices for each function.
But most Ubiquiti devices are going to need some sort of a management machine, running their proprietary software. That could be an old repurposed desktop, a small format computer, or something else. But it will need to be a more mainstream OS — I don’t think a Raspberry Pi will do the job.
I’ve heard good things about Mikrotik, but then they are also vulnerable to the recent VPNFilter malware. And they might do okay on the Routing side, but I don’t know how well they will perform on the firewall or VPN server side.
- bradknowles 8y agoI have been looking for a good gigabit speed multi-WAN firewall/router solution. The Ubiquity Edge routers give you multiple interfaces, and can do multi-WAN, but not at gigabit speeds. And not with also handling VPN functions. I’ve been looking for good NUC or SBC type solutions with enough CPU horsepower and multiple independent NICs, but I haven’t found anything yet. Please let me know if you find anything in this space.
- joshe 8y agoSplitting the vpn/firewall from wireless like a good approach. Any other suggestions for just the vpn/firewall piece?