I agree, shipping is better than not, but that article lists lots of low-hanging fruit that would help users of Processing. One example is designing for autoco

I agree, shipping is better than not, but that article lists lots of low-hanging fruit that would help users of Processing. One example is designing for autocomplete. He asserts that shape(type, ...) is better than square(...), triangle(...), circle(...) because once you know `shape` then typing `sh` finds you all the shapes where as you have no idea what shapes are available when you have to guess all function names (circle?, ellipse?, hexagon?, rhumbas?) IIRC there were other low-hanging fruit.