3 ms·
This part is pretty amazing. > From the time that I mailed my letters, the compound annual return of the respondent group is 8.97% greater than the non-respond
by whack 8y ago
This part is pretty amazing.
> From the time that I mailed my letters, the compound annual return of the respondent group is 8.97% greater than the non-respondent companies.
If anything, I would have expected the opposite. "Successful companies are more busy, and have less time to write letters to strangers. Failing companies love to spend all their time justifying themselves." Glad to see that hypothesis disproven.
If the above correlation does hold across larger sample sizes, I wonder if hedge funds will start using it to identify profitable trades. Send anonymous letters to the executives of public companies, and weight your investments in favor of those who reply. At some point, the executives will wise up and start replying to everyone. But you could make a nice pile of money before that happens.
- jfoutz 8y agoFrom my vague systems experience, it makes sense. If everything works, you have time for random nonsense. You want a sysadmin that’s playing video games all day, because everything is in great shape. Not a constantly stressed , jaded, angry admin. I know nothing of being a CEO, but if the CEO is bored, the company is probably in great shape.