4 ms·
You bring this up presumably because of the tech company angle, to suggest that Bezos buying WaPo is somehow in the same ballpark of influence-purchasing that U
by jameshart 8y ago
You bring this up presumably because of the tech company angle, to suggest that Bezos buying WaPo is somehow in the same ballpark of influence-purchasing that Uber and Google are caught up in here?
That seems to be a slightly disingenuous comparison. For one, Bezos seems to be taking a pretty light touch on Washington Post editorial content, which probably makes sense for him as an owner, since it's probably worth more as a business if it has a solid editorial reputation.
For two, if you're looking to cast aspersions on the editorial influence of owners, you'd maybe want to take a look at who owns the Evening Standard, since that's the paper whose coverage has apparently been put up for sale. It's Alexander Lebedev, billionaire Russian financial/aviation 'oligarch', who was literally a KGB spy in London in the cold war.
But sure, I bet you're right to be concerned about the sinister motivations of a bookseller now he owns a newspaper.
- zerostar07 8y agoBut how can we trust you re unbiased?
- called_it 8y ago> For two, if you're looking to cast aspersions on the editorial influence of owners, you'd maybe The operative word here being "if". Not that it makes sense even granting your motive of wanting to cast aspersions, which you made up in order to to cast aspersions yourself, since it's not a binary choice. To call Bezos a bookseller is just fantastic, you're projecting a whole lot of laughability.