3 ms·
Of course it's trivially solvable in x86-64 because it has a full complement of 32-bit operations inherited from its x86 lineage. The GP is presumably talking a
by BeeOnRope 8y ago
Of course it's trivially solvable in x86-64 because it has a full complement of 32-bit operations inherited from its x86 lineage. The GP is presumably talking about _other_ architectures when he mentions designs that might not want to add a full complement of 32-bit operations.
In any case, the problem doesn't really apply to x86 because all x86 compilers I'm aware of use the "expected" size for the various types rather than larger-than-needed-for-speed, exactly because the smaller operations are all generally available.