It's like the word "standard" has meaning, e.g. "not changing". Not even for good reasons? Well "good" is a subjective statement. Objectively, only changes to m

It's like the word "standard" has meaning, e.g. "not changing". Not even for good reasons? Well "good" is a subjective statement. Objectively, only changes to maintain the standard would qualify, which is a contradiction. I guess, adding to the standard library wouldn't be a problem, but I guess you are rather leaning on security concerns and all that jazz that comes up when rust is discussed. C is open as can be but you can't tack on a change of the semantics without changing the language. Then, what do you still need C for?