> Saying that the market doesn't solve every problem in no way implies that it can't solve a given problem. Nope, I never made such an illogical assertion. >B

> Saying that the market doesn't solve every problem in no way implies that it can't solve a given problem. Nope, I never made such an illogical assertion. >By opt-out I mean opt-out of your standard assigned school district, not out of education. I was pointing out why education may be inelastic. Not assuming you didn't want your children educated. >Teaching 20 kids per year is worth $30K by definition Extremely bizarre logic. If we pay $30k for something and fail then it obviously something is wrong. If other systems pay more than this and don't fail (or at least not as badly) then that makes a rather strong case that the pay is too low. >but we as a society are not opting for it. That doesn't mean it's worth less, that means you're not paying enough and it shows. This furthers the argument that education may not be an elastic market. If people are simply incapable of acting in their own best interest (given the choice, always picking the crappy cheap education for their kids) then there must be intervention. The only reason I'm not convinced that this is indeed the case are grandalf's posts.