4 ms·
Thanks for the feedback. Luckily I do have some autonomy and can onboard who I feel is a strong candidate. It's more when I participate in hiring for other tea
by canterburry 8y ago
Thanks for the feedback.
Luckily I do have some autonomy and can onboard who I feel is a strong candidate. It's more when I participate in hiring for other teams and object to certain candidates that I just want to slap my palm to my forehead. It only affects my team when we depend on deliverables from other teams.
"must be better than the last hired engineer" - This is definitely more aspirational than a hard rule and in fact financially unfeasible in the long term. However, it's a useful measuring stick when you comparing candidates. I typically use existing team members as reference points and try to imagine where the candidate before me will fit in the range of talent we already have.
- AnimalMuppet 8y agoThen that's maybe a long-term way you can fix it. Your team needs to visibly out-perform other teams. Then you can go over the heads of the other team managers to impose better hiring practices. Note that this is primarily a political problem, not a technical one. Truly fixing it may not happen when the other team managers are still in their positions.