> This would still likely be cheaper than $20,00 a month. I'm not sure about that. Non drug interventions that are effective, and not generally cheap. Consider

> This would still likely be cheaper than $20,00 a month. I'm not sure about that. Non drug interventions that are effective, and not generally cheap. Consider that providers of those services are incentivized to capture as much profit as possible. If the alternative to there service is set to let's say arbitrarily $20k, they can probably charge in that neighborhood as well, or higher if the insurance companies can be convinced to pay more.