4 ms·
I'm surprised Pearl doesn't mention reinforcement learning once in this essay. This domain is where Pearl-style causal reasoning frameworks most closely meets d
by howlin 8y ago
I'm surprised Pearl doesn't mention reinforcement learning once in this essay. This domain is where Pearl-style causal reasoning frameworks most closely meets data-driven statistical machine learning methods. Methods such have Dyna (link below) can be seen as reinforcement learning with some degree of "reasoning" about future consequences of actions. I suspect that there is more work to be done in embedding causal methods into planning, though it's pretty clear that a lot of progress is being made in domains such as Atari.
Dyna:
https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/jair/pub/volume4/kaelbling96a-html/node29.html https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/jair/pub/volume4/kaelb...
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- yonkshi 8y agoI agree. RL is most definitely a form of causal reasoning in my book. It involves associations(value iteration), intervention(action/reward) and counterfactual (policy iteration) that Pearl suggested. I think Pearl did not mention specific technology as it's more of a meta discussion.
- kgwgk 8y agoYou may be interested in this talk from one of his collaborators (I’ve not watched it): https://vimeo.com/238266313 https://vimeo.com/238266313
- sjg007 8y agoThanks for this.