4 ms·
Misprint? Commonly available ground source systems can save upto 75%. That's way ahead of the article's claimed 20%. At 20% it's simply not worth the cost of i
by oldcynic 8y ago
Misprint? Commonly available ground source systems can save upto 75%. That's way ahead of the article's claimed 20%. At 20% it's simply not worth the cost of installation.
Dandelion's website won't load to let me check.
- SiempreViernes 8y agoMaybe it's 20 % independently of any temperature gradient ;)
- DannyBee 8y agoThe EER/etc on their pumps is just horrible.
- mikeyouse 8y agoIf I'm reading it correctly, the 20% annual savings figure is for the financed installation. They claim 70% annual savings for the cash installation. So their claim is that even if you include the financing payments, you'll still be paying >20% less for energy throughout the year. See the graphic at the top here: https://dandelionenergy.com/much-money-will-i-save-poughkeepsie/ https://dandelionenergy.com/much-money-will-i-save-poughkeep...
- ericd 8y agoI wonder how their economic viability changes if interest rates double. A lot of these kinds of companies seem to have assumptions of historically cheap money baked in.