3 ms·
You need to give a few examples, else you make a full-stop assumption of the opposite nature. Also, I think you mean a priori.
by brianlash 16y ago
You need to give a few examples, else you make a full-stop assumption of the opposite nature.
Also, I think you mean a priori.
- jerf 16y agoDo you have strong opinions about abortion? Whatever they are, there's a non-profit actively working to the contrary. Do you have strong opinions about what is a bad way to help poor people, perhaps even harming them? There's a non-profit doing that. Do you have strong political opinions? There's a non-profit, probably a very well-funded non-profit, promoting the opposite with things you consider lies. That's before we even get into corruption or just plain administrative competence. Specific examples would just set the thread aflame; it's pretty obvious "hideously ineffective" and "[what] I find full-stop evil" non-profits exist. Your list may be different than my list, but we could both come up with one. Unless you have no strong opinions, in which case we could probably still find something in the political category to get you worked up if we tried.
- brianlash 16y agoI won't disagree with any of that, nor on the face of it do I disagree with Patrick. My only issue with his comment is that he's challenged an argument on the basis of a faulty assumption (that charities do good) by introducing a new assumption (that charities might do good, but often do evil) without defending it. So from the standpoint of defensible logic it isn't much better. I see another commentor made a point about the International Tobacco Growers Association. That's all I was looking for... something we can sink our teeth into that allows the skeptics among us to reject Conclusion A for Conclusion B.