3 ms·
You've got it backwards though. A paper isn't good because it's in Nature - it's in Nature because it's good.
by fwip 8y ago
You've got it backwards though.
A paper isn't good because it's in Nature - it's in Nature because it's good.
- rlayton2 8y agoI'm actually more concerned about the negative (your statement is mostly true), i.e. "if it's in a second-tier journal, it doesn't exist". Sure, some just look for an outlet for their crappy research, but the publication outlet shouldn't be used as a shortcut to evaluating quality.