3 ms·
10 Percent of Broadband Subscribers Suck Up 80 Percent of Bandwidth
- ilamont 19y agoMore telco FUD and scapegoating. Their train of reasoning leads to a few obvious solutions: 1) Charge users more 2) Since Pirate Bay and the other p2p services can't be squeezed or driven out of business, get YouTube, Hulu, and other video providers to pony up 3) Make sure Net Neutrality has a stake driven through its heart at the earliest possible convenience
- wallflower 19y agoA small percentage of users are trying to get $10k/month bandwidth for $60/month.
- cstejerean 19y agoand a large percentage of users are paying $60 a month for $10 of bandwidth. And if ISP's have a problem keeping up with the demand why do they always block attempts of other players that want to enter the market? I'm perfectly happy with having ISP disconnect heavy users as long as there are plenty of other alternative ISPs.
- superchink 19y agoIt's a shame that the Comcasts and Time Warners monopolize this space. I feel wrong about paying my bill to TW - but I still do, every month.
- Conceptual 19y agoThe Pareto principle (aka the 80/20 rule): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle I've noticed this in my own business as well -- 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes.
- deleted 19y ago[deleted]
- phaedrus 19y agoThe way it should be: 1. New technology, faster internet 2. People use it 3. People demand more 4. Go back to step one, only better The way the telcos want it: 1. Old technology 2. People use it. 3. People demand more. 4. Block the people demanding the most. 5. Great! We've broken the upgrade loop!