>Not an auspicious beginning to start this off wrong. The opposition to cameras has nothing to do with the Justices being "technophobic" The camera thing is al

>Not an auspicious beginning to start this off wrong. The opposition to cameras has nothing to do with the Justices being "technophobic" The camera thing is always my barometer of when a criticism of our judicial system's tech problems is going to be worthwhile. I've only followed a few SCOTUS cases with any close attention, but it only took reading ONE oral argument transcript followed by seeing the news to understand why they shouldn't allow cameras. The news' coverage was downright atrocious; the only possible explanation outside actual malicious intent to mislead the audience is if they didn't read any of the memoranda or attempt to understand the case. I don't trust those people with video of oral argument.