5 ms·
It's obvious that a small group of great programmers beats a large group of bad ones. This is pointed out constantly on HN and in other programming communities.
by docgnome 16y ago
It's obvious that a small group of great programmers beats a large group of bad ones. This is pointed out constantly on HN and in other programming communities. I'm curious though if anyone has any hard data to support this, beyond anecdotal evidence. (I'm not disagreeing with the sentiment, I agree completely. I'm just interested in seeing any studies done on the subject. I imagine this applies to many other fields as well.)
- tamersalama 16y agoData are hard to come by in the industry (compared to, say, manufacturing where science branches were spawned based on analysis, observations). From where I stand, the cost of poor quality software goes beyond the production. It's more in maintenance, licensing, lost opportunities, and poor adaptability to changing business needs.
- docgnome 16y agoRight. Which is why we need a long term study. To follow a product from conception to production to end of life.
- gaius 16y agoIt's obvious that a small group of great programmers beats a large group of bad ones The question is, tho', "at what"? Oracle's product offering is VAST. And most of it is technically quite simple; it just does an awful lot. You can't use clever Lisp macros to do stuff like this: http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WhyIsPayrollHard http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WhyIsPayrollHard You just have to chuck people at it.