4 ms·
Most radiologists don't seem interested. I don't know if it is due to work flow, being used to thousands of sliced orthogonal CT readings or both, but the idea
by CyberDildonics 8y ago
Most radiologists don't seem interested. I don't know if it is due to work flow, being used to thousands of sliced orthogonal CT readings or both, but the idea alone doesn't seem to get anyone excited.
Also on the workflow aspect I think no one wants to wait for something that takes longer to generate, longer to load, and possibly can't be shared as easily through epic or some other software.
- riahi 8y agoI mean, our entire specialty day-in and day-out is looking through thinly sliced images of patients to diagnose and monitor disease. We are absolutely used to triplane images. I also agree that waiting for 3D renders is a huge time suck and often why we will just read from the source data. They can be shared just as easily since they are usually exported back into the VNA (archive) with the original DICOM source data. However, I’m curious who this product is for, because most radiologists don’t need or want it. Is it for: PCPs? Presurgical planning? Patients? Research? I’m just trying to see who the market is.