3 ms·
Take a small look a the overall process here: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/data-protection-factsheet-role-edpb_en.pdf https://ec.
by ainiriand 8y ago
Take a small look a the overall process here:
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/data-protection-factsheet-role-edpb_en.pdf https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/d...
First you should receive an enquiry about yor DPA asking for the information they need and your processes, if they deem it necessary they will do an in-depth investigation. After that, they can reach a conclusion. Then if you are still not GDPR complaint, you will be fined.
- JumpCrisscross 8y agoEach of the EU's twenty-eight members will have their own interpretation of the process. In any case, the fines aren't the problem. It's the cost and distraction of going through this process. That cost is imposed irrespective of whether one is doing everything correctly. Responding to DPA requests, investigations, et cetera is a reasonable burden for a company like Facebook. For many start-ups, it may make sense to partition and/or delay their European roll-outs.
- ainiriand 8y agoBut as the PDF says, fines are an exception. There are other machanisms to protect the users.
- JumpCrisscross 8y ago> In any case, the fines aren't the problem. It's the cost and distraction of going through this process. >> fines are an exception. There are other machanisms to protect the users Fines aren’t the problem. It’s the cost and distraction of going through this process. Those “other mechanisms” are still costly and distracting, even if you did nothing wrong.