> Especially with commands being logged, one slip-up (paste, tabcomplete etc) could end up in public .tsv files for anyone to see. That argument can be extende

> Especially with commands being logged, one slip-up (paste, tabcomplete etc) could end up in public .tsv files for anyone to see. That argument can be extended to anything and as such cannot be deemed valid. I could accidentally post AWS secrets as my user-agent in my browser. Does that mean everyone on the internet should be held accountable to GDPR because I might visit them and my user-agent end up in their server-logs? Ofcourse not. Microsoft is clearly showing a reasonable effort w.r.t. limiting what gets logged and how. That should be more than enough to appease any GDPR-concerns. They can't be held accountable for all possible errors or error-modes in the known universe. If anyone here is claiming they should, what they then also claim is that any software handling user-data must be 100% bug-free to be GDPR-compliant. And that's obviously a ludicrous position. Stop the nonsense.