4 ms·
This looks like a completely unsubstantiated manufactured news article. As an aside, any notion that OLED is the next generation, or natural successor, is ques
by endorphone 8y ago
This looks like a completely unsubstantiated manufactured news article.
As an aside, any notion that OLED is the next generation, or natural successor, is questionable. I've gone though a long line of both OLED and LCD smartphones, and each has its advantages.
OLED is lower power if the screen is dark, but if the screen is bright it is a significantly higher power user. OLED burn-in is still a very serious problem, and many users don't realize that the "burn-in proof" screens (something claimed as a new innovation each year since the first introduction of OLED) do it by intentionally wearing out other parts of the screen to try to equalize the fade. After not a long time an OLED screen is much dimmer than it started, and they usually start fairly dim. And even then you'll still see grain and other wear on it.
OLED is an amazing technology, especially for occasional or passive use devices. I still want my heavy use screens to be LCD for now.
OLED is great for non-rectangular, low brightness uses. It's great for non-flat displays. Otherwise its merits are oversold.