4 ms·
I would use something like typed racket or haskell for all the critical parts to increase safety. Then I would check the performance bottlenecks and rewrite the
by b-man 16y ago
I would use something like typed racket or haskell for all the critical parts to increase safety. Then I would check the performance bottlenecks and rewrite them in C if needed.
Then I would use a more programmer friendly language on top of that. Something like Scheme, Ruby, Python and the like.
Stratified design, basically.
- rbanffy 16y ago> I would use something like typed racket or haskell for all the critical parts to increase safety I am not sure about Haskell, but, from my limited experience, Erlang runs at levels very close to C (my C, at least)
- davidw 16y agoIn terms of speed? Erlang's not even in the ballpark that C is in. I'm pretty sure Haskell significantly outperforms Erlang as well. http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/which-programming-languages-are-fastest.php http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/which-programming-lang...
- rbanffy 16y agoWell... At least my C is regarded as very readable ;-)