It's possible to believe that having an immigration policy and laws is a legitimate and constitutional need for the country, and still think that the way they'r

It's possible to believe that having an immigration policy and laws is a legitimate and constitutional need for the country, and still think that the way they're being enforced is neither legitimate nor constitutional. Instead of having a secure border line, where we enforce immigration law, and legitimately ask everyone to identify themselves, we have this giant zone extending well into the country where people are presumed to be crossing the border. If we simply physically controlled the line itself, this zone would not be necessary, and the conflict between enforcing immigration law and the fourth amendment would go away.