Wikipedia probably falls more in the secondary source category. In fact, I'm quite certain it does. If you think about the numbers between the amount of inform

Wikipedia probably falls more in the secondary source category. In fact, I'm quite certain it does. If you think about the numbers between the amount of information and citations on wikipedia, vs. the amount of information that is on "reliable, fact-checked publications", it becomes obvious that there is an immense amount of first-party information and citations.