3 ms·
Sure, but that doesn't mean WE should trust said systems. Whether those systems trust each other or not is irrelevant to the question of whether or not I should
by bilbo0s 8y ago
Sure, but that doesn't mean WE should trust said systems. Whether those systems trust each other or not is irrelevant to the question of whether or not I should trust them.
- carapace 8y agoIt's something to keep in mind when designing our own personal meta-strategies for how to deal with the [dis]information glut. As a global society we are starting to come to self-awareness, and confronting the need to distinguish between hallucinations and real sensory inputs. [1] We're in the situation of a person who has suddenly woken up after falling asleep while driving on the freeway. We have to clear away the cobwebs and dreamstuff, but quick, and get back in our lane and out of the way of that oncoming semi-truck. The global AI is already here, and it has people for neurons. Katsuhiro Yoneshige's service functions like a close-to-primary-perception locus of attention, compared to most news services which are more like idle daydreams. In this memetic evolutionary system, there's about to be a strong selective pressure towards fidelity in communications. (Cf. Musk's Pravda thrust.) [1] "Anatomy of an online misinformation network" (plos.org) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17173593 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17173593 This is on Public Library of Science analyzing what, in psychological terms , could be considered a neurosis in the global human psyche.