3 ms·
It appears so: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Human_Stain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Human_Stain >Roth described in a 2012 piece for The New Yorker
by OscarCunningham 8y ago
It appears so:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Human_Stain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Human_Stain
>Roth described in a 2012 piece for The New Yorker how his novel was inspired by an event in the life of his friend Melvin Tumin, a "professor of sociology at Princeton for some thirty years". Tumin was subject to a "witch hunt" but was ultimately found blameless in a matter involving use of allegedly racial language concerning two African American students.
...
>In the reviews of the book in both the daily and the Sunday New York Times in 2000, Kakutani and Lorrie Moore suggested that the central character of Coleman Silk might have been inspired by Anatole Broyard, a well-known New York literary editor of the Times. Other writers in the academic and mainstream press made the same suggestion. After Broyard's death in 1990, it had been revealed that he racially passed during his many years employed as a critic at The New York Times. He was of Louisiana Creole ancestry. However, Roth himself has stated that he had not known of Broyard's ancestry when he started writing the book and only learned of it months later.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- JorgeGT 8y agoWhich proves that despite the naysayers it's actually easy to fix mistakes in Wikipedia: you just need to become a quintessential American novelist and then have the New Yorker publish your letters to that effect.
- sjburt 8y agoReally, you just need to find a published source for your claim. He would have suffered the same challenge trying to have his Brittanica entry changed.
- chris_wot 8y agoThat's kind of hilarious, given that it's not a secondary source but a primary source because it was written by Roth. It really is absurd.