4 ms·

I will not explain all advantages of CSS in JS. You can find a lot of articles on the subject. An example https://hackernoon.com/all-you-need-to-know-about-css-

I will not explain all advantages of CSS in JS. You can find a lot of articles on the subject. An example https://hackernoon.com/all-you-need-to-know-about-css-in-js-984a72d48ebc https://hackernoon.com/all-you-need-to-know-about-css-in-js-...

hguhghuff 8y ago
The core premise for CSS in JS is solved by backticked strings in style tags as shown above. The backticked string style tag shown above already solves all the issues with CSS limitations in reactjs. Here’s what the article you linked to says: “Why does this matter? Not all CSS features can be aliased with JavaScript event handlers , many pseudo selectors (like :disabled, :before, :nth-child) aren’t possible, styling the html and body tags isn’t supported etc. With CSS-in-JS, you have all the power of CSS at your fingertips. Since actual CSS is generated, you can use every media query and pseudo selector you can think of. Some libraries (like jss, styled-components) even add support for neat, non-CSS-native features like nesting!” All addressed by backticked strings in style tags.
- Kiro 8y ago
  Your solution will pollute the CSS namespace.
  - hguhghuff 8y ago
    Can you explain what it means to pollute the CSS namespace and why it matters? Are you sure you are correct or are you just guessing?
    - tekkk 8y ago
      Just stop being so confrontational. Styled-components enable you to use SASS, not having have to invent any classNames or worry about them conflicting, enables you to easily extend those styles and gives you the ability to mix code with your styles in kinda effortless way. Okay granted that mixing code is not as clean as I'd like it to be but still I haven't found a better option
    - Kiro 8y ago
      You name a class ".button" and it will conflict with completely unrelated component's style tags which also have a class named ".button". You don't have this problem with CSS-in-JS. You isolate the styles completely.
- madeofpalk 8y ago
  The core premise for CSS in JS is to work around CSS's global namespace. It means you can write styles for a component using a 'local namespace' and have to worry a lot less about accidentally affecting the styles of other parts of your site. Every other language has scoping, so why can't CSS? This is especially helpful as your site and team scales - you don't need to worry as much about stepping on other people's toes, nor do you need to be as aware of the entire (styling) scope of your website. When you do share/cascade/compose/extend styles, it makes it a lot more explicit in the way you do it. It's basically taking a concept like BEM and baking it into the language, reducing the mental overhead.

hguhghuff 8y ago

The core premise for CSS in JS is solved by backticked strings in style tags as shown above. The backticked string style tag shown above already solves all the issues with CSS limitations in reactjs. Here’s what the article you linked to says: “Why does this matter? Not all CSS features can be aliased with JavaScript event handlers , many pseudo selectors (like :disabled, :before, :nth-child) aren’t possible, styling the html and body tags isn’t supported etc. With CSS-in-JS, you have all the power of CSS at your fingertips. Since actual CSS is generated, you can use every media query and pseudo selector you can think of. Some libraries (like jss, styled-components) even add support for neat, non-CSS-native features like nesting!” All addressed by backticked strings in style tags.

Kiro 8y ago
Your solution will pollute the CSS namespace.
- hguhghuff 8y ago
  Can you explain what it means to pollute the CSS namespace and why it matters? Are you sure you are correct or are you just guessing?
  - tekkk 8y ago
    Just stop being so confrontational. Styled-components enable you to use SASS, not having have to invent any classNames or worry about them conflicting, enables you to easily extend those styles and gives you the ability to mix code with your styles in kinda effortless way. Okay granted that mixing code is not as clean as I'd like it to be but still I haven't found a better option
  - Kiro 8y ago
    You name a class ".button" and it will conflict with completely unrelated component's style tags which also have a class named ".button". You don't have this problem with CSS-in-JS. You isolate the styles completely.
madeofpalk 8y ago
The core premise for CSS in JS is to work around CSS's global namespace. It means you can write styles for a component using a 'local namespace' and have to worry a lot less about accidentally affecting the styles of other parts of your site. Every other language has scoping, so why can't CSS? This is especially helpful as your site and team scales - you don't need to worry as much about stepping on other people's toes, nor do you need to be as aware of the entire (styling) scope of your website. When you do share/cascade/compose/extend styles, it makes it a lot more explicit in the way you do it. It's basically taking a concept like BEM and baking it into the language, reducing the mental overhead.