4 ms·
In a sense, Gates is still the wealthiest, if including the amount he's spent/given. Sure there was some degree of villainy, but nothing compared to the kind p
by xapata 8y ago
In a sense, Gates is still the wealthiest, if including the amount he's spent/given.
Sure there was some degree of villainy, but nothing compared to the kind perpetrated by less famous companies that pollute and/or murder. Microsoft's evil was the kind of first-world problem that we love to get distracted by. Conversely, Gates' charity mostly affects people the "developed" countries like to ignore/exploit.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]