3 ms·
> More intellectually dishonest thing is to not recognize that both of them belong to an evil class of billionaires. But this article isn't about the evil clas
by orf 8y ago
> More intellectually dishonest thing is to not recognize that both of them belong to an evil class of billionaires.
But this article isn't about the evil class of billionaires and who belongs to that class is it? So, it's whataboutism: 'what about mark zuckerberg?'.
- xstartup 8y agoKinda funny, that's all i got from this article.
- coldtea 8y ago>But this article isn't about the evil class of billionaires and who belongs to that class is it Only if we restrict our thinking into how the article frames the world. Which is a sad way of going about reading things...
- orf 8y agoNobodies thinking should be restricted by the framing of an article. I'm just agreeing that it's blatent whataboutism and kind of off topic to bring up something unrelated. I actually do think Mark is likely more dangerous. > The very essence of "whataboutism" is to deflect criticism by directing it at an unrelated party.