5 ms·
Of course the first half of this graph is the same as the journey to creating something that fails :). Persistence is required either way. But it's important to
by QuadrupleA 8y ago
Of course the first half of this graph is the same as the journey to creating something that fails :). Persistence is required either way. But it's important to consider cutting your losses at some point too.
- maxxxxx 8y agoThat's why you shouldn't put too much value into advice from successful people that came back from the brink of failure. For every one that turned almost failure into success there are probably dozens who did the same thing and just failed.
- tlb 8y agoThose are the best available people to ask, though. You wouldn't want to ask people who entirely failed, or never tried. People who claim they never experienced near-failures on their way to success are either lying, or attempted something unambitious, or were so lucky that their experience isn't representative.
- codingdave 8y agoAnd despite the great story this image tells, it also isn't universally true - most of the successful products I've worked on never went that deep into despair. We fixed a problem, built something that worked, got customers, and went fairly quickly from idea to the "OK, but it still sucks" point. Maybe we never hit the height of the image, but we built respectable products that were profitable and fun to work on. Sometimes that valley of despair is something to work through... but just as often, the idea just isn't that great. Telling the difference between the two is the key.