3 ms·
Ninja serializes each tool's output. (I imagine it buffers the output internally. With a moment's thought you can imagine situations specifically engineered to
by tom_ 8y ago
Ninja serializes each tool's output.
(I imagine it buffers the output internally. With a moment's thought you can imagine situations specifically engineered to cause more problems than this solves, but I've been using Ninja for a couple of years now and I've yet to see that happen.)
- pletnes 8y agomake -O does the same. In fact, it can serialize a whole target, at the cost of buffering that output.
- tom_ 8y agoAwesome ;) - thanks for this note. I've been using the same no-dependency no-cygwin Windows build of 3.80 for about ten years, and OS X comes with 3.81, so my GNU Make skills never got any further than that. But this has prompted me to track down a similar Windows build of GNU Make 4.21, so all I need to do now is figure out how to get one set up on OS X... This won't get me to switch away from Ninja when using CMake, but I write my own -j-friendly makefiles sometimes, so this will come in handy.