3 ms·
For obvious reasons can't comment too much, but it does, they did, and makes quite clear that it's not for navigational purposes.
by AnonTemp123 8y ago
For obvious reasons can't comment too much, but it does, they did, and makes quite clear that it's not for navigational purposes.
- marvin 8y agoInteresting, thanks for the tidbit of inside information :) You'll have to pardon me for asking a stupid question, though -- what other purpose than navigation would a maritime weather report/forecast reasonably have? This seems to me at first look as a protection against liability, rather than an actual clarification of the intended usage of the product. I guess I could imagine a use case such as operations planning, e.g. "will we likely be able to perform work on deck tomorrow?", where the stakes are lower, but I imagine the potential for misunderstanding and incorrect usage of such a service would be dangerously big.
- AnonTemp123 8y agoYou're welcome. It's for optimization of future routes -- how do I get from point A to point B while keeping some weather parameters in acceptable range, burning less fuel, and getting there on schedule. And yes, trying not to drive right into a storm. Not quite for trying to maneuver out after you have already driven into one. Of course you can also look at it and figure out of cleaning the deck is a good idea or not. I probably shouldn't comment further, but NTSB's full report is at https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/MAR1701.pdf https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/... and they did not seem to find it too confusing.
- marvin 8y agoThank you :)