Not at all. Thanks for taking a look. :-) Yep, the intention was to implement classes in a more dynamic and hackable way. Ruby was certainly an inspiration, bu

Not at all. Thanks for taking a look. :-) Yep, the intention was to implement classes in a more dynamic and hackable way. Ruby was certainly an inspiration, but I'm not really trying to copy it if that's what you mean. Ruby is pretty good in this regard, except that classes are global. This means that any change you make to a class is permanent (it's not scoped).