3 ms·
After reading the comments in the linked google group it seems like the issue is that they just need to more clearly define (and perhaps more fairly) what ‘meri
by jds375 8y ago
After reading the comments in the linked google group it seems like the issue is that they just need to more clearly define (and perhaps more fairly) what ‘merit’ is.
Each team/role should have this clearly defined to eliminate bias/subjectivity. Also by clearly defining that, you help escape a meritocracy where ‘authority’ decides what ‘merit’ is behind close-doors (which isn’t really a meritocracy).
Instead of abandoning a meritocracy because it has implementation issues, why don’t they just fix the problems?
- cucumberferity 8y ago> Instead of abandoning a meritocracy because it has implementation issues, why don’t they just fix the problems? Because the small group of people pushing these changes don't want meritocracy, they want power and influence merely for having the correct political opinions. They rely on the cooperation of well-meaning people who support diversity but don't see it's ploy for control and power.