4 ms·

I don't disagree - George Galloway and several of the subjects mentioned have connections to RT, Sputnik, etc. Philip Cross has had to remove a fairly sizable a

I don't disagree - George Galloway and several of the subjects mentioned have connections to RT, Sputnik, etc. Philip Cross has had to remove a fairly sizable amount of content that was only sourced to RT and Sputnik (which are not considered reliable, neutral sources). There's a nonzero probability of a Russian connection.

coliveira 8y ago
In matters of war, RT is as reliable as NYTimes. Both are reliably biased, RT to Russia and NYT to American interests. For me at least it is useful to see what each country's narrative is.
- k1m 8y ago
  Feel the same.
- psergeant 8y ago
  Have you ever seen an RT article deeply critical of Putin’s regime?
  - abalone 8y ago
    American media has vigorous criticism within a certain range (roughly the Democrat-Republican spectrum), but it is supportive of common elite interests. For example you will find the NYT rarely criticized on moral grounds the wars that the US waged. Speaking of Herman and Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent is a good analysis of this phenomenon (propaganda in democratic societies), with supporting evidence.