At least as far as the "George Galloway" article is concerned, this is definitely not resolved and this article is plainly disputing that. The linked-to thread

At least as far as the "George Galloway" article is concerned, this is definitely not resolved and this article is plainly disputing that. The linked-to thread on WP:ANB shows that Guy referred this specific issue to the arbitration committee, which, as of May 26th, is still in the process of getting statements and proceeding forward. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#George_Galloway https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests... & the aforementioned noticeboard: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=843016996#Philip_Cross https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Adminis... Edit: I should add I only say this because the article concludes by saying that the issue is resolved and it isn't. ArbCom is supposed to be a process whereby outside intervention is requested, and unless that process does nothing, then it's not worth declaring this finished.