4 ms·
> Non sequitur. Nobody is discussing legal risks. Simply PR ones. What? This is a legal concern! You brought it up and it is a major legal concern across nearl
by cryptoz 8y ago
> Non sequitur. Nobody is discussing legal risks. Simply PR ones.
What? This is a legal concern! You brought it up and it is a major legal concern across nearly all of America!
> This piece isn't designed to help, and it doesn't help.
You are wrong. More people are aware of problems they weren't aware of before. That is usefuuand that is helpful.
- JumpCrisscross 8y ago> You brought it up and it is a major legal concern across nearly all of America What is the legal concern I brought up?
- cryptoz 8y agoRestaurants donating extra food to the homeless is strictly illegal across much of the USA.
- JumpCrisscross 8y agoWhen did I bring this up? In any case, this point is irrelevant. Businesses donating food isn't illegal in Seattle. Here we have a business donating food in Seattle. There is no legal concern. But they'll wake up to a PR itch on Tuesday. That problem would not have happened if they hadn't tried to help. The disincentivisation remains.
- icebraining 8y agoThat doesn't seem to be the case, since the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act.