3 ms·
FWIW the cameras on public transit (which have been the norm in Cologne for at least a decade I think) are legal (under the old data protection laws anyway) bec
by pluma 8y ago
FWIW the cameras on public transit (which have been the norm in Cologne for at least a decade I think) are legal (under the old data protection laws anyway) because the recordings are automatically destroyed after 24 hours or so.
I think the GDPR would protect them because of a number of factors:
* there's a legitimate security interest (vandalism, terrorism, rape and other personal crimes)
* the recordings are not stored longer than necessary to fulfill that purpose
* there is clear signage indicating you are entering an area with surveillance cameras (i.e. you are giving informed consent)
The GDPR protects the individual's right to privacy but it's a balancing act and the security interests are fairly valid.
- usr1106 8y ago> * there is clear signage indicating you are entering an area with surveillance cameras (i.e. you are giving informed consent) So if I don't want to be filmed on the bus I take a taxi for 10 times the price? (Not sure whether they might have cameras, too. Haven't taken a taxi in Germany for many years.) Or I walk 2 hours? That's not what I would call informed consent. It's information yes, but as long as there are no competing bus lines without cameras there is no choice really.